+79.4%
NTNX vs COO
-38.4%
+117.8%
-58.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | COO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -14.7% | +12.4% | +2.6% |
| 7D | -3.9% | -23.3% | +19.4% | +4.6% |
| 30D | +1.7% | -29.5% | +31.2% | +13.9% |
| 3M | +31.7% | -20.0% | +51.7% | +40.9% |
| 6M | +69.4% | -27.2% | +96.6% | +87.4% |
| YTD | +26.6% | -33.9% | +60.5% | +45.6% |
| 1Y | -15.2% | -19.9% | +4.7% | -9.9% |
| All | +79.4% | -38.4% | +117.8% | +102.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside COO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus COO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × COO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded COO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling