+80.8%
NTNX vs CLBK
+52.2%
+28.5%
-58.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLBK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -0.1% | +0.9% | +0.8% |
| 7D | -3.1% | -1.5% | -1.7% | -2.8% |
| 30D | +2.0% | -1.0% | +3.0% | +2.2% |
| 3M | +34.0% | +22.9% | +11.0% | +27.1% |
| 6M | +72.4% | +44.2% | +28.2% | +56.9% |
| YTD | +27.5% | +64.0% | -36.4% | +12.6% |
| 1Y | -18.7% | +65.7% | -84.4% | -28.6% |
| 3Y | +80.8% | +54.1% | +26.7% | +58.5% |
| All | +80.8% | +52.2% | +28.5% | +58.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLBK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLBK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLBK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLBK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling