+79.4%
NTNX vs ALHC
+146.3%
-67.0%
-58.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -2.1% | -0.2% | -2.3% |
| 7D | -3.9% | -5.8% | +1.9% | -4.1% |
| 30D | +1.7% | -3.3% | +5.0% | +1.6% |
| 3M | +31.7% | -37.9% | +69.7% | +29.7% |
| 6M | +69.4% | -29.5% | +98.9% | +68.4% |
| YTD | +26.6% | -35.4% | +62.0% | +25.7% |
| 1Y | -15.2% | -22.4% | +7.2% | -15.2% |
| All | +79.4% | +146.3% | -67.0% | +114.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling