+149.5%
NTAP vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+249.5%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -3.2% | +0.7% | -2.5% |
| 7D | +7.2% | -7.7% | +14.9% | +7.2% |
| 30D | -18.4% | -34.8% | +16.4% | -18.6% |
| 3M | -11.3% | -56.3% | +45.0% | -11.6% |
| 6M | +53.8% | -99.7% | +153.4% | +42.9% |
| YTD | +72.0% | -99.9% | +171.8% | +59.9% |
| 1Y | +68.0% | -99.9% | +167.9% | +56.3% |
| 3Y | +149.5% | -100.0% | +249.5% | +132.5% |
| All | +149.5% | -100.0% | +249.5% | +132.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling