+62.1%
NTAP vs ZBRA
+14.4%
+47.7%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZBRA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.5% | +1.8% | +6.7% | +8.1% |
| 7D | +7.4% | -3.4% | +10.8% | +8.3% |
| 30D | -1.4% | -7.4% | +6.0% | +0.5% |
| 3M | +24.6% | +57.5% | -32.9% | +9.0% |
| 6M | +105.9% | +64.0% | +41.9% | +77.5% |
| YTD | +88.5% | +44.3% | +44.2% | +67.0% |
| 1Y | +62.1% | +10.9% | +51.2% | +55.7% |
| All | +62.1% | +14.4% | +47.7% | +55.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZBRA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZBRA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZBRA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZBRA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling