+151.9%
NTAP vs VMC
+37.8%
+114.1%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.1% | -1.0% | +5.1% | +4.4% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -4.3% | +1.9% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -23.4% | +16.2% | -39.7% | -27.1% |
| 3M | -7.5% | -0.8% | -6.7% | -7.2% |
| 6M | +56.4% | +1.2% | +55.2% | +55.0% |
| YTD | +73.6% | +0.5% | +73.2% | +70.5% |
| 1Y | +68.4% | -2.9% | +71.3% | +67.8% |
| All | +151.9% | +37.8% | +114.1% | +116.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling