+53.8%
NTAP vs TRGP
+16.9%
+36.8%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | +0.3% | -2.9% | -2.6% |
| 7D | +7.2% | +12.4% | -5.2% | +4.5% |
| 30D | -18.4% | +2.6% | -21.0% | -18.3% |
| 3M | -11.3% | +11.9% | -23.2% | -10.6% |
| 6M | +53.8% | +13.9% | +39.8% | +58.0% |
| All | +53.8% | +16.9% | +36.8% | +58.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling