+68.1%
NTAP vs TRGP
+89.5%
-21.4%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -4.5% | +2.9% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -16.1% | -6.5% | -9.6% | -15.5% |
| 30D | -15.9% | -0.4% | -15.5% | -15.4% |
| 3M | -1.2% | +8.8% | -10.1% | -0.7% |
| 6M | +70.1% | +11.0% | +59.1% | +71.2% |
| YTD | +77.9% | +57.4% | +20.6% | +73.1% |
| 1Y | +68.1% | +87.9% | -19.7% | +65.7% |
| All | +68.1% | +89.5% | -21.4% | +65.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling