+58.9%
NTAP vs TRGP
+80.7%
-21.8%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.2% | +1.3% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +0.8% | -1.5% | -0.8% |
| 30D | -0.5% | +11.5% | -12.1% | -1.3% |
| 3M | +4.1% | +9.0% | -4.9% | +3.3% |
| 6M | +88.0% | +20.5% | +67.5% | +83.7% |
| YTD | +75.6% | +59.5% | +16.0% | +63.5% |
| 1Y | +58.9% | +77.9% | -19.0% | +44.4% |
| All | +58.9% | +80.7% | -21.8% | +44.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling