+52.7%
NTAP vs STZ
+14.2%
+38.5%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | STZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -1.8% | +1.7% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -15.1% | +4.9% | -20.0% | -13.2% |
| 30D | -28.1% | +20.9% | -48.9% | -22.4% |
| 3M | -11.4% | +8.0% | -19.4% | -7.5% |
| 6M | +52.2% | -5.3% | +57.5% | +54.6% |
| YTD | +60.4% | +5.9% | +54.5% | +58.1% |
| All | +52.7% | +14.2% | +38.5% | +55.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside STZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus STZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × STZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded STZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling