+127.9%
NTAP vs SPXU
-83.3%
+211.2%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | SPXU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | +1.2% | -3.7% | -2.1% |
| 7D | +7.2% | -7.6% | +14.8% | +4.2% |
| 30D | -18.4% | +5.3% | -23.7% | -15.5% |
| 3M | -11.3% | +9.6% | -21.0% | -6.4% |
| 6M | +53.8% | -4.5% | +58.3% | +56.1% |
| YTD | +72.0% | -25.9% | +97.8% | +61.6% |
| 1Y | +68.0% | -28.9% | +96.9% | +56.1% |
| 3Y | +149.5% | -80.5% | +229.9% | +66.0% |
| All | +127.9% | -83.3% | +211.2% | +68.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SPXU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SPXU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SPXU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SPXU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling