+151.9%
NTAP vs RPRX
+178.9%
-27.0%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RPRX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.1% | +0.8% | +3.2% | +4.0% |
| 7D | -2.4% | +3.6% | -6.1% | -2.6% |
| 30D | -23.4% | +21.2% | -44.6% | -24.4% |
| 3M | -7.5% | +21.6% | -29.2% | -9.0% |
| 6M | +56.4% | +36.7% | +19.7% | +51.6% |
| YTD | +73.6% | +83.7% | -10.1% | +63.4% |
| 1Y | +68.4% | +83.2% | -14.8% | +58.5% |
| All | +151.9% | +178.9% | -27.0% | +139.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RPRX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RPRX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RPRX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RPRX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling