+149.4%
NTAP vs RPRX
+123.5%
+25.9%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RPRX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | 0.0% | -2.3% | -2.3% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -4.0% | +6.2% | +2.6% |
| 30D | -7.0% | +4.9% | -12.0% | -7.7% |
| 3M | +12.3% | +9.4% | +2.9% | +10.8% |
| 6M | +85.1% | +33.3% | +51.8% | +78.7% |
| YTD | +74.8% | +59.0% | +15.8% | +65.7% |
| 1Y | +52.7% | +69.2% | -16.5% | +43.9% |
| All | +149.4% | +123.5% | +25.9% | +131.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RPRX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RPRX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RPRX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RPRX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling