+91.0%
NTAP vs RBRK
+54.9%
+36.1%
-15.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | RBRK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +0.1% | -0.7% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -3.5% | +2.5% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -7.5% | -8.3% | +0.8% | -6.0% |
| 3M | +14.6% | +24.7% | -10.0% | +4.9% |
| 6M | +91.0% | +58.9% | +32.1% | +66.5% |
| All | +91.0% | +54.9% | +36.1% | +66.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RBRK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RBRK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RBRK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RBRK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling