+149.4%
NTAP vs PSKY
-21.8%
+171.3%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PSKY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -5.4% | +3.0% | -2.0% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -6.8% | +9.0% | +2.6% |
| 30D | -7.0% | +10.2% | -17.3% | -7.5% |
| 3M | +12.3% | +0.3% | +12.0% | +12.2% |
| 6M | +85.1% | -7.8% | +92.9% | +85.7% |
| YTD | +74.8% | -23.0% | +97.7% | +77.0% |
| 1Y | +52.7% | -31.6% | +84.3% | +55.3% |
| All | +149.4% | -21.8% | +171.3% | +144.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PSKY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PSKY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PSKY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PSKY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling