+88.0%
NTAP vs PSA
+0.7%
+87.3%
-15.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | PSA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.2% | +1.3% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -3.7% | +2.9% | -1.5% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -7.7% | +7.2% | -2.2% |
| 3M | +4.1% | -0.6% | +4.7% | +4.5% |
| 6M | +88.0% | -0.9% | +88.9% | +86.6% |
| All | +88.0% | +0.7% | +87.3% | +86.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PSA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PSA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PSA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PSA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling