+88.0%
NTAP vs PFGC
+6.6%
+81.3%
-15.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -0.5% | +0.6% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -2.2% | +1.4% | -0.7% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -11.9% | +11.4% | -0.5% |
| 3M | +4.1% | +5.0% | -0.9% | +4.6% |
| 6M | +88.0% | +8.6% | +79.4% | +90.7% |
| All | +88.0% | +6.6% | +81.3% | +90.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling