+58.9%
NTAP vs PEGA
-47.6%
+106.5%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PEGA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.1% | -3.9% | +8.0% | +4.4% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -10.0% | +5.0% | -4.2% |
| 30D | -25.8% | -12.7% | -13.1% | -25.0% |
| 3M | -6.9% | -4.6% | -2.3% | -7.2% |
| 6M | +50.0% | -13.1% | +63.1% | +51.3% |
| YTD | +66.9% | -47.6% | +114.5% | +84.2% |
| All | +58.9% | -47.6% | +106.5% | +75.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PEGA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PEGA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PEGA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PEGA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling