+149.4%
NTAP vs PAYC
-22.8%
+172.2%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PAYC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -1.6% | -0.7% | -2.1% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -8.7% | +10.9% | +3.5% |
| 30D | -7.0% | +1.2% | -8.2% | -7.3% |
| 3M | +12.3% | +58.6% | -46.3% | +3.7% |
| 6M | +85.1% | +56.6% | +28.5% | +70.7% |
| YTD | +74.8% | +36.2% | +38.5% | +64.4% |
| 1Y | +52.7% | -2.2% | +54.9% | +50.9% |
| All | +149.4% | -22.8% | +172.2% | +153.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PAYC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PAYC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PAYC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PAYC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling