+62.1%
NTAP vs LUV
+27.4%
+34.7%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LUV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.5% | +1.4% | +7.1% | +8.4% |
| 7D | +7.4% | -1.0% | +8.3% | +7.5% |
| 30D | -1.4% | -12.4% | +11.0% | -0.3% |
| 3M | +24.6% | -11.0% | +35.5% | +25.3% |
| 6M | +105.9% | -5.0% | +110.9% | +104.7% |
| YTD | +88.5% | -3.8% | +92.3% | +85.3% |
| 1Y | +62.1% | +25.9% | +36.2% | +42.2% |
| All | +62.1% | +27.4% | +34.7% | +42.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LUV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LUV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LUV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LUV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling