+51.0%
NTAP vs LSCC
+68.2%
-17.2%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | +7.1% | -7.2% | -2.1% |
| 7D | -15.1% | +13.0% | -28.0% | -17.9% |
| 30D | -28.1% | -19.8% | -8.3% | -24.2% |
| 3M | -11.4% | -18.4% | +7.0% | -7.4% |
| 6M | +52.2% | -16.1% | +68.3% | +57.3% |
| YTD | +60.4% | +42.7% | +17.7% | +44.4% |
| 1Y | +51.0% | +68.0% | -17.0% | +30.7% |
| All | +51.0% | +68.2% | -17.2% | +30.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling