+58.9%
NTAP vs LSCC
+72.9%
-14.0%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +2.0% | -1.9% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +1.3% | -2.1% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -9.7% | +9.1% | +1.6% |
| 3M | +4.1% | -23.7% | +27.8% | +9.6% |
| 6M | +88.0% | +26.5% | +61.5% | +74.3% |
| YTD | +75.6% | +57.5% | +18.1% | +52.2% |
| 1Y | +58.9% | +75.7% | -16.8% | +35.4% |
| All | +58.9% | +72.9% | -14.0% | +35.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling