+51.2%
NTAP vs LCID
-78.4%
+129.6%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -2.1% | +1.5% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -9.1% | +8.2% | -0.3% |
| 30D | -7.5% | -37.6% | +30.1% | -4.3% |
| 3M | +14.6% | -11.1% | +25.7% | +12.7% |
| 6M | +91.0% | -59.2% | +150.2% | +112.7% |
| YTD | +73.7% | -60.5% | +134.1% | +92.3% |
| 1Y | +51.2% | -78.5% | +129.7% | +87.3% |
| All | +51.2% | -78.4% | +129.6% | +87.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling