+60.5%
NTAP vs KRMN
+14.6%
+45.8%
-38.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -2.4% | +1.7% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -15.1% | +14.2% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -7.5% | -44.5% | +37.0% | -4.1% |
| 3M | +14.6% | -25.0% | +39.7% | +16.4% |
| 6M | +91.0% | -66.5% | +157.5% | +107.1% |
| YTD | +73.7% | -53.0% | +126.7% | +76.8% |
| 1Y | +51.2% | -44.7% | +96.0% | +48.0% |
| All | +60.5% | +14.6% | +45.8% | +31.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling