+149.5%
NTAP vs IWF
+65.9%
+83.6%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | IWF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -1.1% | -1.4% | -1.4% |
| 7D | +7.2% | +2.8% | +4.4% | +4.3% |
| 30D | -18.4% | -7.5% | -10.8% | -11.1% |
| 3M | -11.3% | -8.5% | -2.8% | -2.4% |
| 6M | +53.8% | -7.4% | +61.2% | +67.6% |
| YTD | +72.0% | -2.6% | +74.6% | +78.7% |
| 1Y | +68.0% | -1.8% | +69.9% | +73.3% |
| 3Y | +149.5% | +65.5% | +84.0% | +75.8% |
| All | +149.5% | +65.9% | +83.6% | +75.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IWF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IWF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IWF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IWF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling