+151.9%
NTAP vs IT
-53.1%
+204.9%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | IT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.1% | +2.2% | +1.9% | +3.7% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -6.8% | +4.4% | -1.2% |
| 30D | -23.4% | -0.6% | -22.9% | -24.1% |
| 3M | -7.5% | +3.1% | -10.6% | -9.6% |
| 6M | +56.4% | +25.5% | +30.9% | +44.7% |
| YTD | +73.6% | -23.5% | +97.1% | +83.8% |
| 1Y | +68.4% | -16.6% | +85.0% | +73.2% |
| All | +151.9% | -53.1% | +204.9% | +245.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling