+149.4%
NTAP vs HUBB
+44.4%
+105.0%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HUBB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -2.1% | -0.2% | -1.4% |
| 7D | +2.2% | +1.1% | +1.1% | +1.7% |
| 30D | -7.0% | -9.6% | +2.6% | -2.9% |
| 3M | +12.3% | -6.2% | +18.5% | +14.3% |
| 6M | +85.1% | -6.2% | +91.3% | +86.6% |
| YTD | +74.8% | +3.4% | +71.4% | +67.1% |
| 1Y | +52.7% | +5.3% | +47.4% | +44.1% |
| All | +149.4% | +44.4% | +105.0% | +106.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HUBB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HUBB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HUBB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HUBB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling