+149.5%
NTAP vs HUBB
+57.0%
+92.5%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HUBB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -0.2% | -2.3% | -2.4% |
| 7D | +7.2% | +1.8% | +5.4% | +6.3% |
| 30D | -18.4% | -7.7% | -10.7% | -15.2% |
| 3M | -11.3% | -13.6% | +2.2% | -5.2% |
| 6M | +53.8% | -9.1% | +62.9% | +59.0% |
| YTD | +72.0% | -0.7% | +72.7% | +67.1% |
| 1Y | +68.0% | +1.1% | +67.0% | +61.6% |
| 3Y | +149.5% | +56.2% | +93.3% | +104.2% |
| All | +149.5% | +57.0% | +92.5% | +104.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HUBB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HUBB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HUBB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HUBB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling