+151.9%
NTAP vs GRMN
+165.7%
-13.8%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.1% | +1.8% | +2.2% | +3.6% |
| 7D | -2.4% | +1.7% | -4.1% | -2.8% |
| 30D | -23.4% | +10.2% | -33.6% | -25.5% |
| 3M | -7.5% | -4.7% | -2.8% | -6.5% |
| 6M | +56.4% | +22.3% | +34.1% | +46.9% |
| YTD | +73.6% | +46.7% | +27.0% | +53.1% |
| 1Y | +68.4% | +49.6% | +18.7% | +47.6% |
| All | +151.9% | +165.7% | -13.8% | +125.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling