+153.5%
NTAP vs GH
+355.8%
-202.2%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | -0.3% | +2.2% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +3.3% | -2.1% | +5.3% | +3.4% |
| 30D | -0.2% | -4.5% | +4.2% | +0.1% |
| 3M | +11.4% | +28.9% | -17.5% | +8.7% |
| 6M | +88.7% | +76.5% | +12.2% | +78.1% |
| YTD | +78.9% | +57.6% | +21.3% | +70.3% |
| 1Y | +58.8% | +167.5% | -108.7% | +42.8% |
| 3Y | +153.5% | +377.4% | -223.9% | +115.4% |
| All | +153.5% | +355.8% | -202.2% | +115.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling