+68.1%
NTAP vs GH
+80.5%
-12.4%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -3.7% | +2.0% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -16.1% | -7.7% | -8.4% | -15.6% |
| 30D | -15.9% | -10.0% | -6.0% | -15.6% |
| 3M | -1.2% | +5.5% | -6.7% | -1.3% |
| 6M | +70.1% | +84.9% | -14.8% | +62.8% |
| YTD | +77.9% | +65.0% | +12.9% | +69.5% |
| 1Y | +68.1% | +71.8% | -3.6% | +59.1% |
| All | +68.1% | +80.5% | -12.4% | +59.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling