+49.2%
NTAP vs GGLL
-52.5%
+101.6%
-29.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GGLL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.7% | -4.5% | -5.3% | -9.3% |
| 7D | -22.5% | -1.3% | -21.2% | -22.3% |
| 30D | -25.7% | -36.3% | +10.6% | -23.0% |
| 3M | -9.0% | -42.7% | +33.7% | -5.3% |
| 6M | +49.2% | -53.1% | +102.3% | +47.2% |
| All | +49.2% | -52.5% | +101.6% | +47.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GGLL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GGLL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GGLL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GGLL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling