+149.5%
NTAP vs GEN
+61.9%
+87.7%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -2.2% | +2.3% | +0.9% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -1.2% | +0.4% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -0.5% | +10.1% | -10.7% | -4.4% |
| 3M | +4.1% | +16.1% | -12.0% | -2.1% |
| 6M | +88.0% | +38.9% | +49.1% | +64.6% |
| YTD | +75.6% | +14.4% | +61.1% | +65.0% |
| 1Y | +58.9% | +5.9% | +53.1% | +53.3% |
| All | +149.5% | +61.9% | +87.7% | +114.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling