+85.1%
NTAP vs FLNC
-30.5%
+115.7%
-15.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -8.3% | +6.0% | -1.8% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -4.2% | +6.4% | +2.4% |
| 30D | -7.0% | -20.0% | +13.0% | -5.9% |
| 3M | +12.3% | -56.9% | +69.2% | +16.7% |
| 6M | +85.1% | -35.5% | +120.7% | +91.3% |
| All | +85.1% | -30.5% | +115.7% | +91.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling