+68.1%
NTAP vs FLNC
-69.0%
+137.1%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +10.2% | -11.8% | -2.4% |
| 7D | -16.1% | -2.1% | -14.0% | -16.0% |
| 30D | -15.9% | -20.8% | +4.8% | -14.8% |
| 3M | -1.2% | -61.3% | +60.1% | +4.4% |
| 6M | +70.1% | -50.9% | +120.9% | +74.8% |
| YTD | +77.9% | -69.4% | +147.3% | +83.3% |
| 1Y | +68.1% | -68.4% | +136.5% | +72.1% |
| All | +68.1% | -69.0% | +137.1% | +72.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling