+52.2%
NTAP vs FCEL
+216.2%
-164.1%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FCEL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -6.7% | +4.4% | -2.0% |
| 7D | +2.2% | +15.1% | -12.9% | +1.6% |
| 30D | -7.0% | -16.4% | +9.4% | -6.6% |
| 3M | +12.3% | -5.3% | +17.6% | +11.7% |
| 6M | +85.1% | +124.5% | -39.4% | +69.3% |
| YTD | +74.8% | +126.7% | -51.9% | +58.0% |
| All | +52.2% | +216.2% | -164.1% | +34.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FCEL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FCEL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FCEL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FCEL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling