+85.1%
NTAP vs EQH
+36.7%
+48.4%
-15.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | EQH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | +0.1% | -2.4% | -2.3% |
| 7D | +2.2% | +1.1% | +1.1% | +2.1% |
| 30D | -7.0% | -1.1% | -5.9% | -7.0% |
| 3M | +12.3% | +25.0% | -12.7% | +10.6% |
| 6M | +85.1% | +33.9% | +51.2% | +78.7% |
| All | +85.1% | +36.7% | +48.4% | +78.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EQH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EQH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EQH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EQH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling