+153.5%
NTAP vs EAT
+612.9%
-459.3%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | -3.4% | +5.3% | +2.4% |
| 7D | +3.3% | -4.9% | +8.2% | +3.9% |
| 30D | -0.2% | -1.2% | +1.0% | -0.3% |
| 3M | +11.4% | +52.2% | -40.9% | +4.3% |
| 6M | +88.7% | +65.0% | +23.6% | +73.1% |
| YTD | +78.9% | +55.0% | +23.9% | +65.5% |
| 1Y | +58.8% | +42.1% | +16.8% | +48.7% |
| 3Y | +153.5% | +614.7% | -461.2% | +68.9% |
| All | +153.5% | +612.9% | -459.3% | +68.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling