+149.5%
NTAP vs DPZ
-7.0%
+156.5%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DPZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.7% | +1.8% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -2.5% | +1.8% | -0.3% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -7.0% | +6.4% | +0.8% |
| 3M | +4.1% | +11.6% | -7.5% | +1.2% |
| 6M | +88.0% | -15.2% | +103.1% | +95.3% |
| YTD | +75.6% | -17.2% | +92.8% | +83.5% |
| 1Y | +58.9% | -24.8% | +83.8% | +70.0% |
| All | +149.5% | -7.0% | +156.5% | +147.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DPZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DPZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DPZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DPZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling