+135.8%
NTAP vs DECK
-12.4%
+148.2%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.7% | -1.5% | -8.2% | -9.4% |
| 7D | -22.5% | +6.0% | -28.5% | -23.5% |
| 30D | -25.7% | +7.4% | -33.1% | -27.0% |
| 3M | -9.0% | -11.7% | +2.6% | -6.8% |
| 6M | +49.2% | -11.0% | +60.1% | +51.7% |
| YTD | +60.6% | -15.4% | +76.0% | +63.5% |
| 1Y | +48.7% | +7.2% | +41.4% | +41.7% |
| All | +135.8% | -12.4% | +148.2% | +132.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling