+60.9%
NTAP vs CLBK
+28.0%
+32.9%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | CLBK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -1.1% | +2.8% | +1.5% |
| 7D | +9.9% | +2.5% | +7.4% | +10.0% |
| 30D | -22.1% | +3.7% | -25.8% | -21.7% |
| 3M | -7.7% | -3.3% | -4.4% | -7.2% |
| 6M | +60.9% | +29.6% | +31.3% | +72.9% |
| All | +60.9% | +28.0% | +32.9% | +72.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLBK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLBK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLBK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLBK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling