+119.7%
NTAP vs BTSG
+416.6%
-296.9%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | BTSG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -0.9% | -1.4% | -2.2% |
| 7D | +2.2% | +2.9% | -0.7% | +1.7% |
| 30D | -7.0% | +0.9% | -7.9% | -7.3% |
| 3M | +12.3% | +1.6% | +10.7% | +11.0% |
| 6M | +85.1% | +46.8% | +38.3% | +70.7% |
| YTD | +74.8% | +65.5% | +9.2% | +57.7% |
| 1Y | +52.7% | +136.2% | -83.6% | +29.7% |
| All | +119.7% | +416.6% | -296.9% | +71.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTSG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTSG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTSG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTSG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling