+105.9%
NTAP vs BRKR
+46.4%
+59.5%
-15.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | BRKR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.5% | -0.2% | +8.8% | +8.6% |
| 7D | +7.4% | -8.7% | +16.0% | +8.9% |
| 30D | -1.4% | -9.9% | +8.5% | +0.2% |
| 3M | +24.6% | -3.1% | +27.6% | +21.1% |
| 6M | +105.9% | +45.5% | +60.4% | +93.3% |
| All | +105.9% | +46.4% | +59.5% | +93.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BRKR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BRKR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BRKR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BRKR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling