+58.8%
NTAP vs ARMK
+50.1%
+8.8%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | +1.4% | +0.5% | +1.5% |
| 7D | +3.3% | +1.7% | +1.6% | +2.8% |
| 30D | -0.2% | +3.1% | -3.3% | -0.9% |
| 3M | +11.4% | +9.2% | +2.2% | +8.5% |
| 6M | +88.7% | +43.7% | +45.0% | +64.0% |
| YTD | +78.9% | +57.4% | +21.6% | +51.1% |
| 1Y | +58.8% | +51.9% | +7.0% | +37.6% |
| All | +58.8% | +50.1% | +8.8% | +37.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling