+149.4%
NTAP vs APTV
-56.4%
+205.8%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | APTV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -2.7% | +0.3% | -1.6% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -1.2% | +3.4% | +2.4% |
| 30D | -7.0% | -10.6% | +3.6% | -4.3% |
| 3M | +12.3% | -35.0% | +47.3% | +25.9% |
| 6M | +85.1% | -38.9% | +124.0% | +110.1% |
| YTD | +74.8% | -41.5% | +116.3% | +100.5% |
| 1Y | +52.7% | -45.8% | +98.5% | +78.7% |
| All | +149.4% | -56.4% | +205.8% | +182.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside APTV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus APTV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × APTV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded APTV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling