+58.9%
NTAP vs APTV
-39.9%
+98.8%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | APTV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +3.1% | -2.9% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +4.8% | -5.6% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -0.5% | +2.0% | -2.5% | -1.3% |
| 3M | +4.1% | -34.2% | +38.3% | +20.1% |
| 6M | +88.0% | -34.7% | +122.6% | +115.7% |
| YTD | +75.6% | -37.0% | +112.6% | +101.8% |
| 1Y | +58.9% | -40.4% | +99.3% | +82.8% |
| All | +58.9% | -39.9% | +98.8% | +82.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside APTV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus APTV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × APTV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded APTV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling