+51.2%
NTAP vs AIG
-1.7%
+52.9%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | AIG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | 0.0% | -0.6% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -2.4% | +1.4% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -7.5% | -2.9% | -4.5% | -7.4% |
| 3M | +14.6% | +0.8% | +13.8% | +14.9% |
| 6M | +91.0% | -2.7% | +93.7% | +92.0% |
| YTD | +73.7% | -11.2% | +84.9% | +74.6% |
| 1Y | +51.2% | -1.5% | +52.7% | +49.8% |
| All | +51.2% | -1.7% | +52.9% | +49.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AIG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AIG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AIG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AIG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling