+149.4%
NTAP vs AEHR
+89.8%
+59.6%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AEHR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | +5.3% | -7.6% | -2.8% |
| 7D | +2.2% | +19.1% | -16.9% | +0.6% |
| 30D | -7.0% | -10.0% | +3.0% | -6.7% |
| 3M | +12.3% | +1.3% | +11.0% | +9.9% |
| 6M | +85.1% | +133.8% | -48.6% | +63.5% |
| YTD | +74.8% | +373.3% | -298.5% | +41.3% |
| 1Y | +52.7% | +256.2% | -203.5% | +25.8% |
| All | +149.4% | +89.8% | +59.6% | +85.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AEHR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AEHR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AEHR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AEHR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling