+52.2%
NTAP vs ACM
-20.8%
+73.0%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | 0.0% | -0.1% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -15.1% | +5.4% | -20.4% | -15.0% |
| 30D | -28.1% | +15.1% | -43.2% | -28.3% |
| 3M | -11.4% | -10.5% | -1.0% | -9.3% |
| 6M | +52.2% | -19.7% | +71.9% | +60.1% |
| All | +52.2% | -20.8% | +73.0% | +60.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling