+131.1%
NTAP vs ACGL
+161.8%
-30.7%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.7% | +1.8% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -0.7% | 0.0% | -0.6% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -1.0% | +0.5% | -0.4% |
| 3M | +4.1% | +11.0% | -7.0% | +2.0% |
| 6M | +88.0% | -0.3% | +88.3% | +87.8% |
| YTD | +75.6% | +2.3% | +73.3% | +74.2% |
| 1Y | +58.9% | +6.4% | +52.5% | +56.0% |
| 3Y | +153.6% | +34.0% | +119.6% | +130.3% |
| All | +131.1% | +161.8% | -30.7% | +64.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling