+58.9%
NTAP vs ACGL
+4.8%
+54.1%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.7% | +1.8% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -0.7% | 0.0% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -1.0% | +0.5% | -0.8% |
| 3M | +4.1% | +11.0% | -7.0% | +8.7% |
| 6M | +88.0% | -0.3% | +88.3% | +92.3% |
| YTD | +75.6% | +2.3% | +73.3% | +81.1% |
| 1Y | +58.9% | +6.4% | +52.5% | +65.5% |
| All | +58.9% | +4.8% | +54.1% | +65.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling