+75.8%
NSC vs AZO
+11.4%
+64.4%
-25.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AZO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -1.4% | 0.0% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -2.0% | -0.8% | -1.2% | -1.9% |
| 30D | -3.2% | -5.1% | +1.9% | -2.3% |
| 3M | +3.9% | -7.2% | +11.2% | +5.2% |
| 6M | +7.8% | -20.7% | +28.5% | +12.5% |
| YTD | +13.4% | -14.2% | +27.6% | +15.8% |
| 1Y | +20.3% | -32.2% | +52.5% | +30.5% |
| All | +75.8% | +11.4% | +64.4% | +59.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AZO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AZO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AZO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AZO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling