+74.6%
NSC vs ALHC
+136.3%
-61.7%
-25.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -5.5% | -0.6% | -4.9% | -5.5% |
| 30D | -3.2% | -1.0% | -2.2% | -3.2% |
| 3M | +7.7% | -10.2% | +17.8% | +7.5% |
| 6M | +4.5% | -28.3% | +32.8% | +4.7% |
| YTD | +15.6% | -31.4% | +47.0% | +15.8% |
| 1Y | +19.8% | -16.9% | +36.8% | +19.5% |
| All | +74.6% | +136.3% | -61.7% | +65.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling